Chris Wallace shreds Trump lawyer for each confirming and denying investigation

Leave a Reply

20 Comments on "Chris Wallace shreds Trump lawyer for each confirming and denying investigation"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Miss O
Guest

This lawer said 4 times that he respects attorney client privilege unlike Comey, what a moron! Comey was not Trump lawyer to owe him any such privilege, how stupid can he be…

Eddi Muncy
Guest

This shit is funny as hell. I thought lawyers were supposed to be calm and thoughtful. This guy was falling apart. Priceless.He should go hide somewhere. This is the lawyer that hired a lawyer. lmao

ESLteacher62
Guest

Chris Wallace is VERY annoying.

Mike M
Guest

It's rather obvious that he was answering Chris' question in the context of Trump's tweet, explaining why Rod Rosenstein was mentioned. It is still in the context of a tweet that was a response to unconfirmed leaks by the Washington Post. It is obvious to anyone with half a brain that he wasn't saying that there was in fact an investigation going on.

I guess American politics is just a big childish game of "gotcha" now.

Syneca Wilson
Guest
Manuel Rodriguez
Guest

Mad respect for Chris Wallace. OUTSMARTED a high priced lawyer in every way. You could see in the end when Wallace said 'you can't read my mind', he was just screwing with the lawyer and knew he owned him.

John Doe
Guest

Chris Wallace: "Why is that?"
Lawyer: "Because there's no investigation."
Chris Wallace: "But you just said you don't know if there is.. oh boy this is weird."

willease
Guest

I thought for a moment I was watching a Saturday Night Live skit.

T Lacy
Guest

FAKE NEWS HA??!!

Heffsta02
Guest

…….Chris Wallace took him completely out of context I don't like Trump but this is just cheap

Antoine Marshall
Guest

"I respect attorney client privilege, unlike Comey."

But Comey wasn't acting as an attorney, and Trump isn't a client…

Panzer Lehr
Guest

You people are morons et al.

FluffyBunnyFeet
Guest

Doesn't it seem like any time, anyone in an interview starts a sentence with "Let me be clear", that there is a mass amount of bullshit about to be spewed?

labtide
Guest

Wallace didn't "shred" Sekulow. Maybe Wallace was to dumb to follow Sekulow. Sekulow was using a hypothetical situation.

Official Videos
Guest

i get where his lawyer coming from, stating the legal scenario, but he could of worded it better, to avoid the confusion.

Lawrence Michael
Guest

Poor Donald, he needs to fire this Asshole. Chris Wallace is a bad man!!

Diane Alden
Guest

IN what alternative universe do you idiots live… nice headline . full of bullshit.

MrLikesEverything
Guest

This guy is quickly going to become "former trump lawyer".

James Wilkins
Guest
2:45–3:25: For those that missed Trump's lawyer contradicting himself (since he keeps asserting that Trump isn't under investigation, even though Trump's tweet says he is). "So, here’s the constitutional question, Chris. The president takes action based on numerous events, including recommendations from his attorney general and the deputy attorney general’s office. He takes the action that they also, by the way, recommended and now he’s being investigated by the Department of Justice because the special counsel, under the special counsel regulations, reports still to the Department of Justice—not an independent counsel—so he’s being investigated for taking the action that the… Read more »
Raymond7904
Guest

I gave the lawyer the benefit of the doubt. Maybe he meant IF Trump was under investigation, it would be for following the recommendation of his staff. Maybe he said "Trump is under investigation" in a hypothetical context…but then I watched the rest of the video.

wpDiscuz