Potential Conflict With North Korea: What We Must be Targeted On

Leave a Reply

21 Comments on "Potential Conflict With North Korea: What We Must be Targeted On"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Boilerroom Ed
Guest

Seoul is only 30 miles from the DMZ. The north could run a nuke down there in a rickshaw.

Ian George
Guest

For sure in 2 or 3 years the n koreans will have developed rockets that can strike the western states.The question is can these rockets be nuclear or biologically tipped.?We shot ourselves in the foot when we followed bush and blair when they announced that iraq had weapons of mass destruction.And we subsequently found that this was a gross lie.Once bitten twice shy.

Jperson
Guest

We shot down one of their ICBMs with a weapon in Alaska as a fuck you. N Korea knows they can't fuck with us but I could see them sending chemical weapons to S K or Japan.

Nick Molnar
Guest

what do you intend to do about a potential million man charge, by the North Koreans. Even if its like shooting fish in a barrel we could potential be responsible for a slaughter of biblical proportions.

Im The southpaw
Guest

Hikikomori invasion of DPRK!

Michael Kim
Guest

As a Korean, I appreciate your concern for reunification, as an American, war with the Norks would come at an almost unimaginable price. It could very well become a proxy war with the Chinese equipping the North Koreans, this would be the final blow for US hegemony careful what you wish for!

Gen Ohmni
Guest
The key to winning Korea quickly would be to break the state grip on the narrative that is America was the aggressor and Kim the glorious defender during the 50's all the way to now in the form of American Imperialism and the Kim Dynasty; which is pure horseshit. The problem is though that narrative is so entrenched a dedicated educational program would likely need to be applied in generational terms to break that kind of conditioning. Looks like this will be bloody! However unlike every other intervention in the past – what – 3 decades, this is worth the… Read more »
Comic Book Guy
Guest

100% agree

the critico alternative libertarian media
Guest
the critico alternative libertarian media
want to win a war <nd not be there like in vietname, do it blietzgrieg style, thousands jets and plains coming off sunset like in apocalypse now with music columns blastic misfits ««hybrid moments«« to keep the moral and the jiuce up and scare millions them, who neverr heard punk, then drop everything everything on them gaintling guns, napalm, missiles drones etc but nukes over hanoi and prisions camps and militar facilities then enter with 100.00 soldiers to get the guy and its over if u do it other way the hasve million soldiers n brain crazy pop that will kill… Read more »
Distant light
Guest

North Korea is not the problem China is, we got our ass handed to us the first time because of the support of China stop doing business with China! Their pocket is funding things!

es78xx
Guest

someone is going to press the button first. it's just a matter of time.  is there going to be a stalemate forever for many years down the line?

KNIVESTOTHEBIRDS
Guest

listen to the bird squawks! that's Kek using the birds to show he Endorses what Styx said.

Jack Bower
Guest

I know N K would be a problem 13 years ago.

Bart Cybulski
Guest

@Styxhexenhammer666, I like most of your videos but I have to criticize this one for a lack of consistency on your part (not a warmonger on other occasions but sounding like fucking blood-thirsty neocon right now) and for a lack of understanding of complexity between South, North and Japan. My wife is Japanese that is why I take this a bit personal ;-), the best it would be if US just FUCKED OFF and allowed REAL negotiations to take place, between South and North.

Three Percenter
Guest

The real enemy was China helping out North Korea. This Russia thing is a farce to divert attention from the real enemy. EDIT: How else do you explain their nuclear advancement?

terrence yopert
Guest

can japan do anything about it??i dont really think so

the critico alternative libertarian media
Guest
the critico alternative libertarian media
fact is usa lost in vietnam because it had not end goal, it was a war yoto mzke shity expensive weapons, we won in africa in 3 fronts bec<use we lived in that land for 4000 years Kennedy offered to pay if we le<ve africa afteer thousands lost thsir lifs there, we are talking about billions and usa would have a speci<l commsedervuial rel<tiozhip witgh is pay us gio lieave p<y dvedry person aqhitte all land and all they lost plust give them in usa land to produ e crops there, in total it was 50 billion in 1961 dollars,… Read more »
BOX 1
Guest

the Japanese most likely have nukes, well the blueprints of what and how to build them would be ready to go… The Japs Zero to 100 in a few months, fully nuked up.

Synchronistic Observer 11
Guest
Synchronistic Observer 11

Is it just me or as all this only manifested since Trump took office ?

BOX 1
Guest

There will be a massive refugee influx as people flee NK.

Frank The Tank
Guest

I submit that a full scale war is really unnecessary. What is necessary however is taking out N Korea's fat, psychotic, piece of shit leader. That doesn't require a full blown war. Just a small team, ie seal team six or a Delta team and give Fatboy a double tap in the back of his fuckin head and heart.

wpDiscuz